Tuesday, August 19, 2014

The Movement

Deadpool: The Gauntlet #13 about Deadpool, Blade & the ghost of Benjamin Franklin fighting vampires had the word patriarchy in it. Just having to read this 1 word in my comic book ruins the experience. I don't know if this was a joke at the expense of feminists because she fails & ends up being rescued by Deadpool but obvious social commentary like this brings you out of the story. This is supposed to be entertainment, not some dumb girl's tumblr.

But it doesn't end there because She-Hulk has this ridiculous panel in it. As if the artwork weren't terrible enough it has this stupid line in it. The only good thing about it, is that it shows you can't use this stupid phrase in a conversation without sounding moronic.

So while I'll keep buying Deadpool because he saved the damsel in distress, I will not be reading anymore She-feminist. I'm sure She-feminist will now become huge like The Movement.

The Movement is that comic book that all the feminist geek girls couldn't stop talking about. The team that they were all cosplaying as. It's a comic with lesbians & gays & minorites & anti-religious stories. It's everything a social justice warrior could want in a comic book. It was even written by their favorite female writer. It was a huge success.

Oh wait, it was cancelled. Despite the constant clamoring online of feminists & fake geek girls, they did not buy the comic that they all claim they want.

"Hmm, that’s weird. I would have thought political correctness, class warfare and gender politics would have been a better sell."

(What a surprise, girls not wanting what they claim they want. Where have I experienced that before?) I'm sure it was an awesome comic: nope, nobody like it.

As usual money talks. This is a business & despite what they would have you believe, they do not actually buy comic books. They just click "like" & blog about things they don't like. They just want to destroy comics because anything that is for men must be ruined by these "activists" so that we can't have anything for ourselves.

Thursday, August 14, 2014

Be Handsome

The only difference between a girl accusing you of harassing her & a girl accusing you of flirting with her is how good-looking you are.

Don't believe me? Watch the video below. This guy wearing a cheap store-bought costume interviews a bunch of hot cosplay girls. Pay attention & you will see this man make sexual jokes & touch the girls.

But none of them have complained about being harassed. None of them blogged about what a horrible misogynist he is. Can you guess why?

Because he's a good-looking man. That's the only reason why.



As if that isn't bad enough any convention with an "anti-harassment policy" makes it even easier for fake geek girls to ruin your con-going experience if you aren't handsome enough.

Friday, August 8, 2014

Orphan Black S02

I love Orphan Black. Tatiana Maslany is amazing. She deserves an emmy. She deserves 3 of them, really.

But this 2nd season they have gone overboard with the "grrl power" this past season. It's annoying & really distracts from the show. It's such pandering nonsense for the benefit of fake geek girl feminists who watch this show. I'm talking about stuff that is so obviously forced, that it pulls you out of the story.

In S02E01 (Nature Under Constraint and Vexed) written by Graeme Manson (Male): Sarah asks a boy on a bus "hey, can I borrow your phone?" & he says "can I touch your boob?" so she smacks him & steals his phone. This boy asked for a ridiculously high price to use his phone as a way of saying "no" but instead of getting the hint, she stole his phone & assaulted him. To show us that "boys will be boys" should be stopped even with violence.

In S02E06 (To Hound Nature in Her Wanderings) written by Chris Roberts (Male): Helena is at a bar & when a guy politely invites her to drink with him she physically assaults him! For no reason other than he's fat. She breaks his finger & when he tries to fight back a white knight steps in to save her. The mangina who wrote this episode doesn't even realize what an obvious form of benevolent sexism this scene is because Helena does not need a man to come to her rescue. But this one accidentally just proves the 3 rules of sexual harassment.

In S02E08 (Variable and Full of Pertubation), written by Karen Walton (female): Cosima is somehow a better player at "Rune Wars" then these 4 men. Even though she's never shown any interest in anything even tangentially related. The whole scene was written to show us geeks that girls are better than us at our own things. But her dismissive attitude towards Scott, the man who is helping to keep her from dying, shows how these fake geek girls who invade our past times truly feel about us. They have nothing but disdain for us. This is what White Knights need to realize.

In S02E09 (Things Which Have Never Yet Been Done) written by Alex Levine (Male): Allison, the tiny little suburban housewife, is somehow better with a jackhammer than her husband Donny. But that's not all, in the same episode there is a scene where Scott, the man who is trying to save Cosima's life, is excited that he was able to recover data from an old 5.25" floppy on an ancient PC & how does she thank him? By calling the man a "virgin" when he succeeds. Way to insult your viewers. & it just reinforces what most geek men know, that so-called geek girls look down on us.


Suspension of disbelief can have me overlook plot-holes like: multiple clones living in the same city & an organization that is evil enough to kill but not evil enough to just abduct their clone property; or how everyone knows where Felix lives but his apt isn't under surveillance by the bad guys or retconning both Donny & Project Castor, or a genetically engineered clones who is trans, etc. But suspension of disbelief can not help me overlook the man-hating crap that they are starting to put in the show. & i'm not refering to the nonsense that this idiot wrote about because it's a show about clones, the non-clone characters aren't supposed to be the focus.

Especially considering that it's basically a show about infertile girls who want to have babies.

If they don't tone down the man-hating insults then I may have to stop watching. I watch tv shows to be entertained, not to be insulted.

Wednesday, August 6, 2014

Darkchylde

Some comic books are drawn a certain way. If you don't like the way those comics are drawn don't buy those comics, go buy other comics. It really is that simple. Nobody is forcing you to buy comics you don't like.

When feminists invade they try to change the way things are. That's why they are "fake" geek girls because if they were geek girls then they would like comics the way comics already are, not the way they think comics ought to be.

Some of these fake geek girls made a tumblr (no surprise) ridiculing comic book art. This is what non-geeks do: they make fun of comics & comic art. That's what these fake geek girls are doing. If you don't like the way those comics are drawn, don't buy those comics, go buy other comics. But they don't like comics, they just want to ruin comic books. They also lie & pretend that it is representative of current comics even though they are using his old art work. But the truth never stopped a fake geek girl from creating a good woozle.

Randy Queen, who had his art attacked by these fake geek girls, is fighting back. That is the only way to keep these fake geek girls from destroying our comics. Thank you Randy Queen!

Of course what do these "strong" "independent" feminists do when a man stands up to them? Do they take his advice: "I encourage you to spend your time, energy, and courage on creating your own comics, and then make the necessary personal sacrifices to bring them to the world."? of course not! They whine & cry about it. Unfortunately the internet white knights have delivered by writing
a slew of posts hoping the tumblr girls will sleep with them.

They could make their own comics & post it to Tumblr. If they wanted it in print, they could run a Kickstarter. They could donate their comics to Free Comic Book Day so it could get into people's hands. They could let the market decide. But it's easier for fake geek girls to just whine & destroy what already exists.

I hope Randy Queen & the other artists sue. Now I will go buy some Darkchylde comics. Thanks fake geek girls for letting me know who I should give my money to!

UPDATE

He apologized to the fake geek girls. He explained that he was going through some personal problems & overreacted. I don't think he did. The fact that they were cyber-bullying a real human being won't register with them but that's not surprising. She posted the story to twitter just so all the internet white knights could harass him. These girls know how to play the damsel in distress.

That stupid tumblr is mostly nasty comments that are certainly not "art critiques" & from people who don't read comics. There are tons of submissions from girls who have no idea what characters they are submitting.

eschergirls sucks & just proves that the girls complaining about comics are not comic book readers just more fake geek girls.

Thursday, July 31, 2014

Cosplay Woozle

The woozle starts with this stupid post that claims that "25% of survey responders" were harassed & "59% said they felt harrassment was a problem" but this survey was done by none other than feminist moron janelle asselin who had her survey sabotaged. The results are unreliable nonsense because as she admits: "as the angry fanboys started looking me up after the CBR article, they discovered this survey and started answering my questions and using the open box at the end to write in all sorts of awfulness" but that doesn't stop other news sites from quoting the article & not the original survey. Then other sites jump on the story, spreading the lie even further. Now we have a new woozle.

Do men stare? Yes. Do men take pictures? Yes. Sexual harassment? Groping? That is simply not happening to the astronomical amount as these articles claim. If it was happening that much, girls wouldn't go anymore!

I cosplay. I get dressed up as a character I like, that I think is cool, that I would like to be or who I identify with. I don't do it to show off my sewing skills (I have none). I am dressed that way so people can see characters IRL & so that other fans of that character can talk to me, so I can talk about that character with them (which fake geek girls miscontrue as a quiz & complain about). It's an easy way to meet fellow fans offline.

People take pictures of me. I stop & pose when asked no matter what I am doing. I don't even care that people interupt me. But some people don't ask for permission. That is not harassment! I am in a public place dressed in an unusual manner, people are going to take pictures of me. The tickets also inform you that you will be photographed even if you are not in costume. I have even seen people take pictures of me for the sole purpose of making fun of me online. when I see someone do that I offer to pose for them because in that moment I am having a good time & it doesn't bother me. (There has been only time I found a picture of myself being ridiculed online & surprise: it was at the hands of a girl!) Nobody needs my permission to take a picture of me, even bitches.

But thanks to feminist nonsense "photos without permission" is now an example of harassment. Girls who sell photos of themselves are now claiming that they are being harassed because someone took a photo of them. Is this a joke? Sometimes I ask for permission to take a photo of a cosplayer but many times I don't, because the cosplayer is busy or far away. Male or female, if you are in costume, I will take your picture & I don't need to ask your permission.

If you don't want a geek to take photos of you, don't go to a convention in costume. In fact, don't go to the convention at all. Stay home. We don't want you there anyway.

Monday, July 28, 2014

Prostituted

I am not a gamer. (Yes, I still have my Genesis 32X CD & a PS1 but I am not a gamer.)

I don't follow gaming too closely but this real life girl troll shows up in the websites I read whenever she makes 1 of her terrible videos.

She apparently revealed herself as an anti-whore feminist. Anyway, the pro-whore feminists are now mad at her because they didn't know she was anti-whore & they are all butthurt because they are just now starting to realize they wasted their money giving her $158,922.00US

When she was bashing men they were ok with it.
When she stole another girl's artwork, they were ok with it.

But now that she is insulting whores they are so mad that the claws are out:
http://elevatorgate.wordpress.com/2014/06/16/does-prostituted-women-have-connotations-femfreqvideo-games/

lol, let me make some popcorn.

6/10 would bang




Wednesday, July 16, 2014

Valka Sucks

Not even a kid's movie is safe from feminist idiots. How to Train Your Dragon 2 is somehow a feminist movie & Valka is a "strong female character" after you ignore things like facts & logic.


Did these feminist fools watch the same movie everyone else did? Hiccup's Incubator (she's not a mother because she was gone for 20 years, besides the movies are about Hiccup & Toothless) is not a strong female character. There is nothing strong about her. She is a childish female character & makes girls look bad. She is selfish & a sorry excuse for a mother. She chose to take care of dragons for 20 years while she abandoned her husband & child. Feminists love her because feminists hate mothers.


Hiccup's Incubator may be nurturing to dragons but she's not strong. She looks nothing like all the other strong Viking women in Berk who take care of their children & defend their village. She hides in an ice mountain provided by the male Bewilderbeast & she takes care of injured dragons. Unlike the other Viking women, she was off on her own taking care of animals instead of her son. She is not "tough" or "strong" so of course she needs to get rescued by Hiccup's dad, Stoick. And of course she doesn't protect her son, even when given a 2nd chance. She's useless.


If they make another season of the tv show, which all the fake geek girls writing about this movie obviously have not watched, she should not be in it. Hiccup turned into a good man thanks to his father. Sometimes rebelling from Stoick but many times learning from his father. Adding that terrible excuse for a mother to the show would probably undo a lot of it.


Stoick takes care of his son. Raised his son alone. Sometimes they disagree but many times Stoick & Hiccup learn from each other through compromise. He is a good chief & at one point let's Thornado stay on dragon island to look after the other Thunderdrums. Because he knows that children need a father, unlike Hiccup's incubator. How anyone can say she's a "strong" female character wasn't paying attention or is so immature that they think it's ok to shirk their responsibilities to go play with animals. When she learned how to ride dragons, she could have ridden back to her husband & child & shown the village what she learned. Instead she choose to play all day long, like a child, except she did this for years while her village of Berk was attacked by dragons who could have killed her son & husband. She could have stopped this but chose not to.

 
But this isn't the only thing that annoying feminist fake geek girls complain about. This moron complains that Drago isn't black but she doesn't mention that Astrid is voiced by a latina. As usual, feminists pick & choose what they complain about. Even though Dean Deblois, a gay man who worked on the film, is glad that he made a character gay, the feminist complains that Gobber isn't gay enough & mocks the film-maker for his accomplishment. As I've blogged before, feminists hate all men, even gay men.


Meanwhile this idiot defends all the bad decisions of Hiccup's Incubator because all that matters is validation. I can't imagine how many selfies Aja Romano posts every day so she can be "validated":

"Additionally, the film totally validated her life choices by making her caretaker of the coolest free-range dragon park ever, and presenting the choice to rejoin her family as a choice that would validate all of her earlier choices to leave them behind."

According to this deranged feminist, all that matters is "validation" for selfish decisions, no matter the consequences, even if it means that others have to clean up after you & die in the process. Because being a responsible parent is not important. Aja thinks girls should be allowed to follow their silly whims & abandon their infant son because "life choices." Hiccup's Incubator was close-minded & selfishly abandoned her infant son instead of staying & trying to change everyone's mind the way Hiccup did. A boy, a young man, was able to do what an adult female couldn't. Because girls run away instead of doing the hard work that is necessary to affect change.


"[Hiccup's incubator] proves that women can be badasses as activists and scientists and even, yes, as moms, too"

"As moms"?? By being absent for 20 years? By literally, NOT being a mom, she's a "badass" mom. Feminist logic, everyone! I shouldn't be surprised that this idiot re-defined feminism to mean pacifism because this awful feminist uses the phrase "manpain" to describe men being emotional, a man-hating phrase I've never seen before until I read her garbage.
 

All these moronic feminists are so proud of Hiccup's Incubator, I bet they are also proud of Frankea Dabbs. I could post more but you can see for yourself how many more "mothers" just like her there are.
 

These must all be "strong female characters" who are "a feminist triumph" according to feminist logic, right?

Wednesday, July 2, 2014

Vicki Vale


Another fake geek girl complaining about girl characters in comics. Except this time, no matter how "empowered," "strong" or "capable" the character is, it's not enough.

Somehow Batman does what an entire police department can't but this feminist moron thinks Batman should get help from Vicki Vale in the movie.

Juliet Kahn doesn't understand that it's "Batman & Robin" not "Batman & Vicki." Nobody cares about Vicki Vale. We just want to see Batman, we don't want anyone to help Batman, not even Robin or Alfred.

Could this feminist be more stupid? Could it be more obvious that she doesn't understand Batman or comics in general?

As always the solution is simple: you don't like it? Don't read/watch it!

Thursday, June 19, 2014

Superhero Pinups

Another Mangina trying to look good for the feminists, created "If Male Superheroes Were Treated Equally by Pin-up Artists" and as you expect it's incredibly stupid.

Pin-up girls are drawn in feminine poses because it appeals to men. This crappy sex reversal only reverses the sexes not the appeal. If you really want to treat it equally then you have to reverse the poses as well. You have to use poses that appeal to women like the covers of all those romance novels.

But mangina stephen byrne, kept the same feminine poses, so of course it looks ridiculous. Congratulations dude, you accomplished nothing, except making it clear you know nothing about women or what they find attractive. Your drawing will not help you get laid.

This is why I'm so glad that DC is releasing a ton of actual pinup covers this June. It has made all the feminists freak out (which is why the mangina drew his drawing) & means I will be spending a lot of money.

Feminist kelly thompson makes no mention that the covers are based on the statues that have been previously released when she whines that there isn't a male pinup cover. Even though the statues are mentioned all over the internet but that's what feminists do, omit & distort facts. More likely she is a fake geek girl who didn't even know about the statues & that's why she didn't mention them in her whine.

Despite the the manginas & the feminists at that site, most comic book customers are for it.

Friday, June 6, 2014

Chubbby Chasers

I’m not a chubbby-chaser but I have been accused of being one by some girls because they don't realize that somewhere in between fat & skinny there is normal and curvy & there are some men who prefer that. They think that because they are not skinny that I must be a chubby chaser. I like an hourglass shape & D-cups, however I don't like fat girls.

But the accusation makes me ask:
What is so wrong with those men who actually think fat girls are hot?

Girls say they want to be accepted for who they are but when one of those men show up & shows interest, they reject him as though there is something wrong with him for finding her attractive. But there isn't. If that's what he finds attractive there is nothing wrong with him, there is something wrong with her.

The problem is fat girls know that to most men, they are gross & unattractive. So they rationalize that any man who finds them attractive must be some kind of loser. In their mind only a loser would settle for a fat girl. Which is too bad because some men do prefer fat girls. If a man thinks you are attractive, it’s self-sabotaging to judge him as being weird. It’s no different from men who prefer redheads or men who prefer tattoo girls or leg-men or breast men, etc. Those are the things they find attractive. Real men go for whatever the fuck they like: skinny, curvy or fat.


The other thing fat girls do to blame men is to claim that men "fetishizes" them. Who knows what that even means. Does that mean that men who like big racks are "fetishizing" chests? Should that movie be renamed "Gentlemen fetishize blondes"? A fat girl who says that deserves to be alone. Like this one. She thinks that if you are sexually attracted to her you're a disgusting fetishizing chubby chaser, but if you don't find her attractive then you're a disgusting misogynist who only values women for their bodies. She doesn't realize that she's alone solely because of her personality not her body.

Here is another moron.
Instead of taking advantage of the men who actually find her attractive, she deludes herself into thinking that the chubby chaser who talks to her in a book store is doing so because he likes the books she reads. But this dummy doesn't realize that the book store chubby chaser is just good at hiding the fact that he's a chubby chaser. It's more "Fat Logic" at work.

He is probably the guy she rejected on online & he figured out where to meet her.
I'm sure this morbidly obese girl isn't a hypocrite who is so superficial or shallow as to have some kind of physical requirement in the man she wants to meet. "The thought of meeting a single, tall, brainy, emotionally available type who likes Scrabble, reading, travel, going to the gym and eating dessert.." Oh, a tall man, she must "fetishize" tall men. "How gross!"

These hypocrites deserve to be alone.

For some lolz here's someone turning the tables on another fat girl who doesn't like short men & a fake chubby chaser blog.