Thursday, July 31, 2014

Cosplay Woozle

The woozle starts with this stupid post that claims that "25% of survey responders" were harassed & "59% said they felt harrassment was a problem" but this survey was done by none other than feminist moron janelle asselin who had her survey sabotaged. The results are unreliable nonsense because as she admits: "as the angry fanboys started looking me up after the CBR article, they discovered this survey and started answering my questions and using the open box at the end to write in all sorts of awfulness" but that doesn't stop other news sites from quoting the article & not the original survey. Then other sites jump on the story, spreading the lie even further. Now we have a new woozle.

Do men stare? Yes. Do men take pictures? Yes. Sexual harassment? Groping? That is simply not happening to the astronomical amount as these articles claim. If it was happening that much, girls wouldn't go anymore!

I cosplay. I get dressed up as a character I like, that I think is cool, that I would like to be or who I identify with. I don't do it to show off my sewing skills (I have none). I am dressed that way so people can see characters IRL & so that other fans of that character can talk to me, so I can talk about that character with them (which fake geek girls miscontrue as a quiz & complain about). It's an easy way to meet fellow fans offline.

People take pictures of me. I stop & pose when asked no matter what I am doing. I don't even care that people interupt me. But some people don't ask for permission. That is not harassment! I am in a public place dressed in an unusual manner, people are going to take pictures of me. The tickets also inform you that you will be photographed even if you are not in costume. I have even seen people take pictures of me for the sole purpose of making fun of me online. when I see someone do that I offer to pose for them because in that moment I am having a good time & it doesn't bother me. (There has been only time I found a picture of myself being ridiculed online & surprise: it was at the hands of a girl!) Nobody needs my permission to take a picture of me, even bitches.

But thanks to feminist nonsense "photos without permission" is now an example of harassment. Girls who sell photos of themselves are now claiming that they are being harassed because someone took a photo of them. Is this a joke? Sometimes I ask for permission to take a photo of a cosplayer but many times I don't, because the cosplayer is busy or far away. Male or female, if you are in costume, I will take your picture & I don't need to ask your permission.

If you don't want a geek to take photos of you, don't go to a convention in costume. In fact, don't go to the convention at all. Stay home. We don't want you there anyway.

Monday, July 28, 2014


I am not a gamer. (Yes, I still have my Genesis 32X CD & a PS1 but I am not a gamer.)

I don't follow gaming too closely but this real life girl troll shows up in the websites I read whenever she makes 1 of her terrible videos.

She apparently revealed herself as an anti-whore feminist. Anyway, the pro-whore feminists are now mad at her because they didn't know she was anti-whore & they are all butthurt because they are just now starting to realize they wasted their money giving her $158,922.00US

When she was bashing men they were ok with it.
When she stole another girl's artwork, they were ok with it.

But now that she is insulting whores they are so mad that the claws are out:

lol, let me make some popcorn.

6/10 would bang

Wednesday, July 16, 2014

Valka Sucks

Not even a kid's movie is safe from feminist idiots. How to Train Your Dragon 2 is somehow a feminist movie & Valka is a "strong female character" after you ignore things like facts & logic.

Did these feminist fools watch the same movie everyone else did? Hiccup's Incubator (she's not a mother because she was gone for 20 years, besides the movies are about Hiccup & Toothless) is not a strong female character. There is nothing strong about her. She is a childish female character & makes girls look bad. She is selfish & a sorry excuse for a mother. She chose to take care of dragons for 20 years while she abandoned her husband & child. Feminists love her because feminists hate mothers.

Hiccup's Incubator may be nurturing to dragons but she's not strong. She looks nothing like all the other strong Viking women in Berk who take care of their children & defend their village. She hides in an ice mountain provided by the male Bewilderbeast & she takes care of injured dragons. Unlike the other Viking women, she was off on her own taking care of animals instead of her son. She is not "tough" or "strong" so of course she needs to get rescued by Hiccup's dad, Stoick. And of course she doesn't protect her son, even when given a 2nd chance. She's useless.

If they make another season of the tv show, which all the fake geek girls writing about this movie obviously have not watched, she should not be in it. Hiccup turned into a good man thanks to his father. Sometimes rebelling from Stoick but many times learning from his father. Adding that terrible excuse for a mother to the show would probably undo a lot of it.

Stoick takes care of his son. Raised his son alone. Sometimes they disagree but many times Stoick & Hiccup learn from each other through compromise. He is a good chief & at one point let's Thornado stay on dragon island to look after the other Thunderdrums. Because he knows that children need a father, unlike Hiccup's incubator. How anyone can say she's a "strong" female character wasn't paying attention or is so immature that they think it's ok to shirk their responsibilities to go play with animals. When she learned how to ride dragons, she could have ridden back to her husband & child & shown the village what she learned. Instead she choose to play all day long, like a child, except she did this for years while her village of Berk was attacked by dragons who could have killed her son & husband. She could have stopped this but chose not to.

But this isn't the only thing that annoying feminist fake geek girls complain about. This moron complains that Drago isn't black but she doesn't mention that Astrid is voiced by a latina. As usual, feminists pick & choose what they complain about. Even though Dean Deblois, a gay man who worked on the film, is glad that he made a character gay, the feminist complains that Gobber isn't gay enough & mocks the film-maker for his accomplishment. As I've blogged before, feminists hate all men, even gay men.

Meanwhile this idiot defends all the bad decisions of Hiccup's Incubator because all that matters is validation. I can't imagine how many selfies Aja Romano posts every day so she can be "validated":

"Additionally, the film totally validated her life choices by making her caretaker of the coolest free-range dragon park ever, and presenting the choice to rejoin her family as a choice that would validate all of her earlier choices to leave them behind."

According to this deranged feminist, all that matters is "validation" for selfish decisions, no matter the consequences, even if it means that others have to clean up after you & die in the process. Because being a responsible parent is not important. Aja thinks girls should be allowed to follow their silly whims & abandon their infant son because "life choices." Hiccup's Incubator was close-minded & selfishly abandoned her infant son instead of staying & trying to change everyone's mind the way Hiccup did. A boy, a young man, was able to do what an adult female couldn't. Because girls run away instead of doing the hard work that is necessary to affect change.

"[Hiccup's incubator] proves that women can be badasses as activists and scientists and even, yes, as moms, too"

"As moms"?? By being absent for 20 years? By literally, NOT being a mom, she's a "badass" mom. Feminist logic, everyone! I shouldn't be surprised that this idiot re-defined feminism to mean pacifism because this awful feminist uses the phrase "manpain" to describe men being emotional, a man-hating phrase I've never seen before until I read her garbage.

All these moronic feminists are so proud of Hiccup's Incubator, I bet they are also proud of Frankea Dabbs. I could post more but you can see for yourself how many more "mothers" just like her there are.

These must all be "strong female characters" who are "a feminist triumph" according to feminist logic, right?

Wednesday, July 2, 2014

Vicki Vale

Another fake geek girl complaining about girl characters in comics. Except this time, no matter how "empowered," "strong" or "capable" the character is, it's not enough.

Somehow Batman does what an entire police department can't but this feminist moron thinks Batman should get help from Vicki Vale in the movie.

Juliet Kahn doesn't understand that it's "Batman & Robin" not "Batman & Vicki." Nobody cares about Vicki Vale. We just want to see Batman, we don't want anyone to help Batman, not even Robin or Alfred.

Could this feminist be more stupid? Could it be more obvious that she doesn't understand Batman or comics in general?

As always the solution is simple: you don't like it? Don't read/watch it!