Vicki Vale

Another fake geek girl complaining about girl characters in comics. Except this time, no matter how "empowered," "strong" or "capable" the character is, it's not enough.

Somehow Batman does what an entire police department can't but this feminist moron thinks Batman should get help from Vicki Vale in the movie.

Juliet Kahn doesn't understand that it's "Batman & Robin" not "Batman & Vicki." Nobody cares about Vicki Vale. We just want to see Batman, we don't want anyone to help Batman, not even Robin or Alfred.

Could this feminist be more stupid? Could it be more obvious that she doesn't understand Batman or comics in general?

As always the solution is simple: you don't like it? Don't read/watch it!

Superhero Pinups

Another Mangina trying to look good for the feminists, created "If Male Superheroes Were Treated Equally by Pin-up Artists" and as you expect it's incredibly stupid.

Pin-up girls are drawn in feminine poses because it appeals to men. This crappy sex reversal only reverses the sexes not the appeal. If you really want to treat it equally then you have to reverse the poses as well. You have to use poses that appeal to women like the covers of all those romance novels.

But mangina stephen byrne, kept the same feminine poses, so of course it looks ridiculous. Congratulations dude, you accomplished nothing, except making it clear you know nothing about women or what they find attractive. Your drawing will not help you get laid.

This is why I'm so glad that DC is releasing a ton of actual pinup covers this June. It has made all the feminists freak out (which is why the mangina drew his drawing) & means I will be spending a lot of money.

Feminist kelly thompson makes no mention that the covers are based on the statues that have been previously released when she whines that there isn't a male pinup cover. Even though the statues are mentioned all over the internet but that's what feminists do, omit & distort facts. More likely she is a fake geek girl who didn't even know about the statues & that's why she didn't mention them in her whine.

Despite the the manginas & the feminists at that site, most comic book customers are for it.

Chubbby Chasers

I’m not a chubbby-chaser but I have been accused of being one by some girls because they don't realize that somewhere in between fat & skinny there is normal and curvy & there are some men who prefer that. They think that because they are not skinny that I must be a chubby chaser. I like an hourglass shape & D-cups, however I don't like fat girls.

But the accusation makes me ask:
What is so wrong with those men who actually think fat girls are hot?

Girls say they want to be accepted for who they are but when one of those men show up & shows interest, they reject him as though there is something wrong with him for finding her attractive. But there isn't. If that's what he finds attractive there is nothing wrong with him, there is something wrong with her.

The problem is fat girls know that to most men, they are gross & unattractive. So they rationalize that any man who finds them attractive must be some kind of loser. In their mind only a loser would settle for a fat girl. Which is too bad because some men do prefer fat girls. If a man thinks you are attractive, it’s self-sabotaging to judge him as being weird. It’s no different from men who prefer redheads or men who prefer tattoo girls or leg-men or breast men, etc. Those are the things they find attractive. Real men go for whatever the fuck they like: skinny, curvy or fat.

The other thing fat girls do to blame men is to claim that men "fetishizes" them. Who knows what that even means. Does that mean that men who like big racks are "fetishizing" chests? Should that movie be renamed "Gentlemen fetishize blondes"? A fat girl who says that deserves to be alone. Like this one. She thinks that if you are sexually attracted to her you're a disgusting fetishizing chubby chaser, but if you don't find her attractive then you're a disgusting misogynist who only values women for their bodies. She doesn't realize that she's alone solely because of her personality not her body.

Here is another moron.

Instead of taking advantage of the men who actually find her attractive, she deludes herself into thinking that the chubby chaser who talks to her in a book store is doing so because he likes the books she reads. But this dummy doesn't realize that the book store chubby chaser is just good at hiding the fact that he's a chubby chaser. It's more "Fat Logic" at work.

He is probably the guy she rejected on online & he figured out where to meet her.
I'm sure this morbidly obese girl isn't a hypocrite who is so superficial or shallow as to have some kind of physical requirement in the man she wants to meet. "The thought of meeting a single, tall, brainy, emotionally available type who likes Scrabble, reading, travel, going to the gym and eating dessert.." Oh, a tall man, she must "fetishize" tall men. "How gross!"

These hypocrites deserve to be alone.

For some lolz here's someone turning the tables on another fat girl who doesn't like short men & a fake chubby chaser blog.

Alpha Fux, Beta Bux

Up until now Once Upon A Time has been very good. Sure there are "strong women," but the men aren't punchlines. They are capable & heroic. But S03E18 “Bleeding Through” exposed Alpha Fux Beta Bux from a woman's perspective in a shockingly unapologetic way.


Cora got pregnant by some gardener (alpha fucks). She lied to Prince Leopold keeping it a secret so he would marry her & Cora even stole gold from Leopold because the gardener was blackmailing her (beta bucks). Leopold was originally going to marry Eva but when Eva found out about the lie she exposed Cora's stealing & lying to him. Leopold broke it off with Cora & married Eva, an honest virgin who gave him a daughter (Snow White).

Men shouldn't raise another man's kid because as Eva said to Leopold: "A more worthy wife will give you the child that you deserve"

Leopold & Eva

Fast forward to the present & using magic, Eva's daughter (Snow White) & Cora's daughter (The Evil Queen) looked into the past & saw all of this. Their reaction was disappointment in Eva!! Because she stopped Cora from tricking a beta into raising an alpha's son! Cora's daughter actually says to Eva's daughter "I'm sorry you had to learn she had such darkness in her past" & she actually agrees!


Somehow on the show that constantly talks about right & wrong, the good character & the bad character both thought it was ok to trick a man into raising another man's child. Somehow honesty is referred to as "darkness" because it stopped a Beta from raising an Alpha's kid.

Even in The Enchanted Forest alpha fux & beta bux.

Doctor Who

A few years ago I noticed a lot of Doctor Who stuff in America. I thought it was odd because it's a British show. Then I noticed that there were a lot of girls talking about it. "How weird, girls like sci-fi now?" but I mostly ignored it until last year when it seemd to be everywhere so I decided to check it out. #FOMO

But like Abed, I needed to watch Inspector Spacetime from the beginning. That's right, I'm watching the old black & white episodes from the 60s, with the 1st doctor. As of this blog post, I've watched 65 episodes. They are low-budget & look like stage plays but everyone involved took it very serious. 

The dvds from Netflix have extras that usually don't show other Doctors but The Romans dvd did & there was a clip of one of the modern Doctors & suddenly it all made sense.

The reason why there are so many fake geek girls these days that like Doctor Who is because the BBC hired some attractive men as the modern Doctors & they also made the modern incarnation campy & romantic. So now it's basically a show about a cute man that makes fun of sci-fi, so of course girls like it. They just watch it for cute Doctors and they have no problem admitting it.

I'll probably stop watching it when I get to the modern campy era, which is ironic because that's why I started watching it in the 1st place.

Wonder Girl

I'm not even going to go into how offensive janelle asselin's "critique" is to artist Kenneth Rocafort. I'm not going to go into it because Brett Booth did, & he was accused of being sexist by the internet white knights.

His complaints were valid. Anyone who has ever taught or who has been a manager, knows that when you offer criticism you first start with positive aspects then you go into the negative but she didn't. She attacked with lines like "The cover to the new "Teen Titans" #1, released earlier this week, is not just a terrible comics cover,..."

Brett Booth's tweets were about how she wasn't writing an art critique but just attacking the cover. He was right, she was attacking the cover. She used that cover to go on a rant about how girls are drawn in comics but the internet white knights had to put a misandrist spin on it & accused Brett Booth of being a mysoginst. What's funny is that at first they recognized it for what it was, a "hit piece" it's right there in the URL.
The only reason she thinks it's terrible is because she's a feminist with a declining career. She went from working at DC to writing "hire this girl" articles for a website. She has a feminist agenda & pushes it everywhere she goes, to the detriment of her own career. She could have stayed at DC & made comics that don't offend her feminist ideals, instead she just whines about it online. janelle asselin is just another hypocrite feminist posting pictures of shirtless men. I mean, she complained about the notebook paper because being such a comic book art "expert" she somehow missed the school bus & didn't realize it's about kids who attend school.

Her fake geek girl rant is also yet another instance of a girl using Facebook "likes" to project that girls "might" buy a comic in the future, which in fact does not prove who is actually purchasing this comic. It only proves who clicked "like" on Facebook. Nothing more. It's more woozle effect. Those people who clicked like on a tv show Facebook page are not going to buy the comic. Facebook likes do not equal purchases. This is a business after all. Money talks. There was a Teen Titans comic book based on the cartoons. It was cancelled.

"This is not a cover you run if you're trying to appeal to teenagers, and it's especially not going to appeal to teen girls."
DC is not trying to appeal to teen girls. why is it necessary to say "duh" to this feminist? Are not enough people saying it to her? I'm so sick of hearing about "potential readership" & "potential customers." Those people don't exist. Girls aren't going to start reading comics because Wonder Girl wears a b-cup. That's nonsense.

"YA is selling like crazy right now."
but Teen Titans isn't YA (Young Adult) novels. YA are novels, without pictures, that girls are buying, not comic books. So again, duh! Girls don't buy comics. They click "like" on Facebook & buy YA novels. They are not potential customers of this comic book.

But janelle asselin is not an art critic. She's a feminist & she freaked out over this cover for that reason alone. It's a pretty standard cover. It is nowhere near terrible. In fact Wonder Girl has been drawn that way before & even her new action figure looks like the cover.

Look, if you don't like comics don't buy them. Nobody is forcing you to buy comics. Vote with your wallet, buy your "grrl power" comics, either the market will adapt or it won't. But if you write some obviously feminist article about how an entire industry should change just to suit you & imaginary customers, don't be surprised when the current customers become upset.

 

The customers on Twitter got very angry, which is what happens when yet another annoying feminist starts trying to destroy our comics. Then she blogged about how people were being mean to her, on Tumblr, of course. The only good part of her Tumblr-whine is where she accidentally provides evidence of what we knew all along: these fake geek girls view geeks with contempt & disgust. She lets it slip here:
"And so as soon as the angry fanboys started looking me up after the CBR article,.."

Oh, those angry fanboys? Those fanboys, such losers those fanboys, amirite? Not Titans fans, not Booth fans, comic fans, not geeks but fanboys. You know, the derogatory term for comic book readers. I'm sure she didn't write that to make more guys mad her & keep trolling. But that wasn't enough, she had to keep trolling & posted on that cesspool website that all the fake geek girls post on when they want to whine into an echo chamber. It riles up the feminists who know nothing about comics to invade comic spaces.

"the problem is that too many other men think that they are in a crowd of like-minded men who are super sick of this feminazi bullshit."
Except that we are super sick of this feminazi bullshit. We just use our money to express ourselves while vocal internet white knights try to win your favor in the comments. But make no mistake, the backlash these fake geek girls are experiencing is real & it's only going to get worse. But you can't stop a feminist troll from kicking the hornet's nest so she decided to write yet another Tumblr post in order to push her feminist agenda by saying all comic geeks are rapists.

"You can choose to not rape women and instead to treat us as equals."
Of course, to her, every man is a rapist: "I also assume that there are other men I’ve met who are rapists."

And somehow she thinks men aren't going to get sick of this? Even an internet white knight should get sick of this.

Mangina Sites

Avoiding websites meant for girls isn't enough. You also need to avoid websites written by Manginas.

These morons think that if they can blame men for everything enough & hate themselves enough, then girls will like them. They are obviously super-inexperienced when it comes to girls or they would realize how unattractive they are to girls.

How to deal with these mangina sites? Don't use adblock, instead block the site itself using these instructions. By not giving these sites the advertising dollars generated by clicks of outrage we can vote with our wallets & instead give that ad money to legitimate websites that don't hate men.

Here is my list of websites filled with manginas that you should avoid. Here is an even longer list of sites you should boycott.

io9 sucks
It's run by fake geek girls who hate genre stuff. Most of the posts on there are about what's wrong with genre stuff & they disquise it by asking readers how to "fix" some story or property.

io9 also sucks because they really try to cultivate the whole white knight culture they have going on there. The commenters try to one up each other trying to be noticed by the girls who "write" there. Sometimes they even post blatantly anti-male junk that they copied over from jizzebel.

gamma squad sucks
The are another mangina site like. They link all the time to themary stupid & whine about muhsuhjuhnee.

the good men project sucks
This website tricks you into thinking that you've found a website where you can discuss men's issues & be vulnerable because there are a lot of articles about that. But it's published by a girl, most of the commenters are girls & every day there is a new article blaming you for raping girls. It's also filled with bad advice that will destroy your relationship/marriage. No matter how much of a mangina you become, it's never enough for the feminists. It's probably why the founder got fed up & left the site.

Now it's overrun with man-hating feminists trying to convert you into being a subservient mangina. There are a few good articles on there but the constant barrage of anti-male posts & the unapologetic censorship that takes place in the comments makes it a site to avoid.

dr. nerdlove sucks
I've linked to comments on his site, but not his articles. This mangina gives awful advice blaming geeks for everything wrong with their love life.

the huffington post sucks
People share it's anti-male articles all the time. They even have a section just for blaming men for everything. I don't click on their articles anymore even when it's not gender-related because everything has that slant there.

salon sucks
This site is filled with feminist nonsense like this advice that unironically encourages & confirms alpha fux, beta bux. I thought it was satire but it turned out to be serious.

slate sucks
I've never read this site because other men pointed out how bad it is.

the atlantic sucks
I've never read this site either because other men have pointed out how bad it is since 2008!

cracked sucks
They only have 1 good article. The rest is crap like this: “the-5-most-ridiculously-sexist-superhero-costumes” & then when the "writer" was criticized by the readers he responded with this. But if it couldn't be more obvious that cracked is run by white knights, they published an “article” by zoe quinn when she wasn't getting any more attention (because gamergate had moved on & was ignoring her).

the daily dot sucks
They have their own resident fat feminist who I've written about before. She is a 2nd rate lindy west, who is so desperate for controversy that she published a piece of fiction from a girl hoping to be the next adria richards. She is constantly saying nonsense things about media. The daily dot even had an interview with the girl who runs the good mangina project where she repeats what other feminists say about feminist men. That they need to shut up about feminism.

comics alliance sucks
This is the worst comic book related website out there. Not only do they publish janelle aselin's weekly whine about hiring more girls in comics, they publish SJW crap on a regular basis, most of it by their resident white knight andrew wheeler, take a look at this fat loser hoping to ingratiate himself to girls in the hopes that they'll sleep with him like other white knights. Here are some examples of the crap they post there:
Fear As A Way Of Life: Why Women In Comics Don't 'Just Report' Sexual Harassment
How Misogyny in Gamer Culture Hurts All of Us
'Sin City: A Dame To Kill For' Red Band Trailer Promises Girls, Girls, Girls, Inevitably
Where Are Superhero Comics' Big Name Bisexual Characters?
Girl Fight: The Marvel/DC Rivalry Finally Extends To Winning The Female Audience
But like most SJW they have no problem with double standards though.
Best Abs Ever (This Week): An Appreciation Of Male Comic Book Eye Candy
Why Big Superhero Muscles Aren't The Same Thing as Sexy Curves

gothamist sucks
This is a NYC news blog but a male feminist has taken over the comments section & this ridiculous looking white knight is now a moderator. (As I’ve said before, take a look at this guy. They all look the same. ) They now post feminist "articles" instead of news.

Female Stupidity is Toxic

I started reading women's websites because it's good to learn about how they think in their own words. Red Pill sites can tell you about women but if you don't believe it, just read multiple women confirm it themselves. It was also easy to read those girl sites because they weren't blocked at work (surprise surprise) and they had new content every day (because girls can never seem to shut up).

Typical girl

But if you read them too much you will get depressed at how awful girls really are. How ignorant they are. How slutty they are. It can cloud the way you think about girls & make you angry at all of them.

So I stopped. It was making me too angry. I deleted all the bookmarks. I resisted the urge to see what the online morons thought about a particular issue. I focused on websites that I enjoyed and more manosphere sites. Reading intelligent comments from men, made me less angry & more wise.

The only problem is when I log onto facebook & read nonsense from my female friends. Sometimes I point out how wrong they are so that their male friends will take the Red Pill and I unfollow the ones who are just too retarded that they can't even count to potato.

Nofapious of Borg

Jean-Luc agrees

I'm not religious but I decided to give up abusing myself for Lent.

It's not just that pron is bad for you, it also takes up a lot of time (searching for it, downloading it & organizing it).
My time is better spent doing other things.

Woozle Effect

A sorry excuse for an article about geek conventions had this bit of misinformation, with no source, presented as fact:

"Women make most tech buying decisions, download more movies and TV shows than men, and play more games on certain platforms."

What a ridiculous statement. You can tell just by reading it that it isn't true. But fake geek girls repeat it & repeat it. That's called The Woozle Effect. Using social media engagement as proof that more women purchase these things is nonsensical. Posting about something online is not the same as spending money. These are all businesses. Only money matters. Tweeting & "liking" is not money.

"Women make most tech buying decisions" This can't be verified. It is a judgment statement. Who makes the decisions? Everyone will say that they make the decisions. "download more movies and TV shows than men" This also can't be verified and non-geek media is obviously included based on the wording so it is irrelevant to geek cons. "play more games on certain platforms." The key words in this one are "certain platforms." They play more touchscreen & Facebook games, not consoles. Taken together these unverifiable claims prove nothing more than that this "evidence" does not apply to geek cons.

When the "author" was pressed to back it up she replied with this link & she said Also, just Googling the issue will bring up a slew of other studies and surveys on this point." Even though as the writer it’s her responsibility to back up her claims but this is nothing new when it comes to feminists. “Just educate yourself”

That website has as its "source" this phrase: "According to a new report from Parks Associates" which is not a source. Searching for Parks Associates brings us to their website where they provide ZERO data to justify this outrageous claim. They also provide ZERO links to primary sources. They don't even mention what data they analyzed! They just spout random percentages based on aether. Continued searching brings us to this article where we discover that it was a survey and the so-called "data" was based on what people said they were THINKING of buying IN THE FUTURE. Not what they actually bought. Because what women are thinking of buying in the future now counts as actual purchases. (By that “logic” men buy more time traveling cyborgs than women because I'm thinking of buying a T-800 one day.) But she never mentioned that link; she just included more woozles instead of addressing their pre-cog survey.

A site with ZERO citations to where they got this "data"
Another site with ZERO citations to wherethey got this "data."
Has some citations & despite this, merely confirms what all geeks already know. That women use social media all day long & play casual games.

The info cited here says that 45% of gamers are women and also shows thatcasual/social games account for a big chunk of the gaming pie.  And oh look, women play more of that type of game:

Women play more casual games, nobody disputes this. That will be relevant when the next C3 takes place, you know, Candy Crush Con. Did you get your 3-day pass yet?

"Beyond that, I've sat in tons of meetings with tech and gadget companies on the issue of engaging women--how to do it, how not to do it, etc.--and each time the marketing folks cite similar numbers and studies. So no, the claim is not "outrageous" or "ridiculous"."

That’s exactly how the woozle effect works. Keep repeating the lie & no one will question it. If this ridiculous claim were true, the market would reflect these purchases. Dollars speak louder than blogs. In certain segments of the market it is true (iCrap, failbook games, Wii, etc.) but for other segments, it simply isn't true or Anita would have nothing to vlog about. 

Now, as to whether the market would definitely reflect this if the claims are true, I can only say to you: Have you met the Patriarchy? Do you not know our friend sexism?

Her answer as to why the market doesn't reflect actual spending dollars is "The Patriarchy"?! Yet it very clearly reflects it in terms of iPhones, laptops & other small consumer electronics? You can't argue that the market doesn't reflect women's spending when it clearly does. Oh wait, I forgot: "The Patriarchy!" You win.